Academic Misconduct
It refers to any action that undermines the integrity of the educational process and gives unfair academic advantage to any student. Academic Misconduct is taken seriously by the University as it violates ethical standards and undermines the value of academic credentials. The academic misconduct is broadly classified under the following two sections:
- Unfair Means: Any action that gives a student unfair advantage in an assessment which may include the following:
- Cheating: Use of unauthorized materials, devices, or assistance during an exam. This may include the following:
- Copying from another student’s answer sheet.
- Using cheat sheets or notes.
- Employing electronic/smart devices to access information.
- Impersonation: It includes having someone else take the exam on behalf of the student, or taking an exam for someone else.
- Unauthorized Collaboration: To work with other students on an exam that is supposed to be completed individual.
- Compulsion: To attempt to influence examiners through threats or any form of coercion to gain an advantage.
- Forging Documents: To alter or create fake examination documents or credentials.
- Disruptive Behaviour: To act in a manner that disrupts the examination environment or the ability of other students to complete their exams.
- Exchange of Information: To communicate with other students during the exam through any means, including whispering, passing notes, or using hand signals.
- Misrepresentation: To provide false information or documentation to gain access to an exam or to excuse an absence.
- Indiscipline: This may include the following:
- Engaging in aggressive or confrontational behaviour with invigilators, examination officials or other students.
- Leaving the examination hall without permission or without submitting the answer sheet.
- Altering or damaging examination papers or answer sheets.
- Not adhering to siting arrangements or other established protocols.
- Frequent and suspicious request to leave the examination room.
- Taking the answer sheet with him/her at the end of the examination.
In case of any of the above actions by the students, the invigilator should immediately document the incident noting all relevant details in the proforma available with the Centre Superintendent, collect all relevant evidence for use of unfair means (if any) and shall immediately issue a new answer booklet by writing UFM across on the title page of the original booklet. Further, the invigilator must report the incident to the Centre Superintendent/Deputy Centre Superintendent/CoE/Dy. CoE. At the end of the examination, the invigilator shall submit the duly filled proforma, any evidence of Unfair Means, original booklet and new issued booklet to the Centre Superintendent for further action. All such cases will be submitted to the Unfair Means committee by the CoE office for further investigation and proceedings.
In addition to the above clauses, any other act by the student during examination which may be deemed fit for Unfair Means may also be reported by the Invigilators/Examination officials for necessary actions.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism refers to the act of presenting someone else’s work, ideas, data, language without giving proper credit. It violates academic integrity standards and undermines the principal of honesty, fairness and originality expected in scholarly endeavours. DIT University has a strict policy in place to deter and address plagiarism. This policy includes Need and guidelines for Plagiarism check, Academic Dishonesty Policy and Penalties based on Level of Plagiarism and Composition of Institute and Departmental Integrity Panels. In addition, it is advised that the faculty members should be vigilant in identifying potential plagiarism through continuous review and also provide students with training on proper citation practices and the importance of academic integrity.
Leaving the examination hall due to medical reason before the completion of the examination
If a student becomes ill during an examination, he/she shall notify the invigilator immediately. A student may be allowed to leave the examination room temporarily for illness. However, during his absence a member of the university staff shall accompany the student. If the student desires to complete the examination, he/she will not be allowed an extension of time beyond the announced examination end time. In case of serious illness, if a student desires to discontinue writing the examination, he/she may be permitted by the invigilator after informing the Centre Superintendent to leave the examination hall. If such a case occurs the invigilator shall sign the answer booklet stating the time at which the student left.
Appointment and Responsibilities of External Examiner
Certain degree program (such as Architecture, Pharmacy, Nursing, Healthcare, Doctoral etc.) may require appointment of examiners from outside the university.
Appointment of External Examiner
The process of appointing an External Examiner shall be as per the need based on the program requirements or regulatory guidelines. The criteria and process for appointment of External Examiners shall be as follows:
- The list of potential external examiners shall be prepared by the respective course coordinators in consultation with the Heads/Deans of the respective Departments/Schools/Colleges keeping in mind that the external examiner satisfies the following:
- A relevant academic and/or professional qualification atleast a level higher than being examined.
- Significant experience in Teaching, Research and Assessment at a comparable academic level.
- In-depth knowledge and expertise in the specific subject area being examined.
- No conflict of interest with the university as well as the students being examined.
- Prior experience as an examiner shall be preferable.
- A strong commitment to maintain high standards of fairness and transparency in assessments.
- Good communication skills and ability to provide constructive feedback.
- Willingness and ability to commit the time required to fulfil the responsibilities as an external examiner.
- Compliance with any specific requirements set by the regulatory bodies.
- On the recommendation of the Heads/Deans of the respective schools, approval of the list of the examiners shall be taken from the Vice Chancellor.
- The term of appointment of the external examiner shall be typically for One Academic Year with the possibility of renewal based on the feedback.
- The appointed external examiners shall be formally notified by the University and their willingness to perform the duties of External Examiners shall be sought.
Support and Resources for External Examiner
The University shall provide the following support and resources to the External Examiner:
- The Course Coordinator/Head of the Department shall act as a point of contact from the University to assist the External Examiner with logistics and queries.
- The respective department shall provide necessary facilities an access to University systems during the process of evaluation by the External Examiner.
- The Course Coordinator/ Head of the Department shall clearly discuss with the External Examiner the criteria and guidelines for assessing student’s work.
- The University shall provide appropriate honorarium for the services provided by the External Examiner as per the approved policy. This shall also include reimbursement for travel and accommodation expenses if physical presence is required.
- The Course Coordinator/Head of the Department shall provide standardise template for reporting marks and feedback and also specify the schedule for submission of these.
Review and Renewal
After the end of the assessment conducted by the External Examiner, the Head of the Department shall conduct a performance review on the contributions made and feedback given by the External Examiner. Based on the performance review the department shall decide on the re-appointment of the External Examiner for future assessments.